In software procurement, few words are as seductive—and dangerous—as "Unlimited." For IT directors and finance teams forecasting annual spend, an unlimited envelope plan offers the promise of budget certainty. It suggests a fixed cost regardless of how many contracts, offer letters, or NDAs the organization processes. However, in the e-signature industry, "unlimited" is almost never a mathematical reality; it is a marketing term governed by a "Reasonable Use Policy" (RUP) that can shatter your budget mid-contract.
The mechanism is simple but often overlooked during the initial purchase. Vendors know that 90% of their customers will send fewer than 50 envelopes per user per year. For these customers, the "unlimited" label is safe. But for the 10% of power users—often the very enterprises that need these tools the most—the RUP acts as a tripwire. Once your volume exceeds a hidden threshold, the vendor's algorithm flags your account, not for a congratulatory upgrade, but for a renegotiation that typically involves moving to a "custom enterprise" tier at a significantly higher price point per envelope.
The Mathematical Reality of "Reasonable Use"
While sales reps pitch "unlimited," the Master Services Agreement (MSA) often defines "Reasonable Use" as a specific number—frequently between 100 to 120 envelopes per user, per year. If you purchase 10 seats, your "unlimited" pool is actually capped at roughly 1,000 to 1,200 envelopes. Exceeding this aggregate limit triggers the overage clauses.
The Overage Cliff
The financial impact of hitting a RUP limit is rarely linear. It does not simply mean paying for the extra envelopes at the same effective rate. Instead, it often forces a migration to a different pricing structure entirely. We call this the "Overage Cliff."

As illustrated above, a company on a standard "Business Pro" plan might enjoy a flat monthly rate while their volume grows. However, once the aggregate volume crosses the RUP threshold (the "Fair Use Cap"), the vendor may revoke the grandfathered pricing. The organization is then forced to purchase "envelope packs" or upgrade to an Enterprise license, often retroactive to the start of the billing cycle. This can result in a 300% to 500% increase in annualized cost overnight, purely because the procurement team relied on the marketing definition of "unlimited" rather than the legal definition.
Why Automation Breaks the Model
The primary driver for hitting these caps is rarely manual sending. It is automation. When an organization integrates e-signature into their CRM (like Salesforce) or HRIS (like Workday), the friction of sending a document drops to near zero. A sales team that manually sent 5 contracts a week might automate the sending of 50 NDAs a week.
"Unlimited" plans are designed for human speed, not machine speed. Most RUPs explicitly exclude "automated," "bulk," or "API-driven" sending from their unlimited tiers. If your implementation plan involves API integration or automated webhooks, you are likely already in violation of the standard unlimited terms, regardless of your total volume. The vendor's system detects the velocity of envelope creation—bursts of 100 envelopes in a minute, for example—and automatically flags the account as "non-human usage," triggering the clause that voids the unlimited pricing.
Defensive Procurement Strategies
To avoid the Overage Cliff, procurement teams must shift their negotiation strategy from "price per seat" to "committed volume."
- Demand the RUP NumberNever accept "it's just to prevent abuse." Ask for the specific integer that defines abuse in the contract. Is it 100 per seat? 500? Get it in writing.
- Negotiate a Soft CapInstead of an automatic price hike or service suspension, negotiate a "true-up" clause. This allows you to pay for overages at a pre-agreed rate at the end of the term, rather than being forced into a mid-year contract restructure.
Ultimately, the safest approach for any growing business is to assume "unlimited" does not exist. By calculating your Total Cost of Ownership based on actual volume projections, you can compare vendors on a level playing field. A vendor offering a hard cap of 5,000 envelopes might actually be cheaper and more transparent than one offering an "unlimited" plan that hides a cliff at 1,000.
Transparency is the only metric that matters. If a vendor cannot tell you the exact number of envelopes you are allowed to send before the price changes, you are not signing a fixed-price contract—you are signing a variable-rate loan.
Manus AI
Senior SaaS Procurement Consultant